If your dog is outside make sure that it always ha

first_img If your dog is outside make sure that it always has an adequate supply of fresh clean water and a place to shelter from the sun. If possible, bring outside dogs inside on hot days. Dog walkers should be aware than on a hot day of 25ºC with little wind and low humidity the paving and tarmac can reach a scorching 52ºC. Dog walkers should consider the “5 second rule” – this is a simple test where you place the back of your hand on the pavement. If you cannot hold it for five seconds then it’s too hot to walk your dog. Dogs paws are just as sensitive as human feet and susceptible to getting painfully burned even on days that don’t appear overly hot. Older and obese dogs, as well as dogs with medical problems should be kept inside if possible. Snub-nosed such as Bulldogs, Pugs, Boston Terriers, Lhasa Apsos, and Shih Tzus can also be susceptible to hot weather problems and should be watched for signs of overheating. The best time for walking or playtime with your dog is in the cool of the early morning or evening, but never after a meal or when the weather is very hot and humid as dogs can dehydrate very quickly. ShareTweet Cars can be death traps for dogs, even with the windows open. A car can go from comfortable to oven-like in minutes, so never leave your dog alone in a car. And don’t think that a cloudy day or parking in the shade reduces the risks. The sun moves during the day and clouds can actually magnify the heat. If you are taking your dog along in the car for a long trip, always carry a container of cool water for him. Bringing your dog to the beach is fine, as long as you can ensure he will have shade when he needs it and plenty of clean, fresh water. If your dog likes to swim in the sea, be sure to wash him off with fresh water as soon as possible as salt water can be rough on the coat and skin. Summer also brings dangers in the form of insecticides, weed sprays, and snail baits, to name a few, so watch out for these hazards in gardens and on your walks. Tips for keeping your dog cool in the summer heat was last modified: July 2nd, 2019 by John2John2 Tags: DERRY City and Strabane District Council is advising dog owners to look after their pets in the summer heat.A spokesperson said: “Summers here, so don’t forget that dogs suffer from the same problems as ourselves in hot weather – dehydration, overheating, and even sunburn. “If you keep a few things in mind and take action early, you and your dog can have a great summer! cool waterdehydrationDerry and Strabane CouncilTips for keeping your dog cool in the summer heatlast_img read more

Were beginning to approach oversold territory and

first_img We’re beginning to approach oversold territory and, as you probably already know, how soon we get to those lows will depend on how quickly the powers-that-be take the remaining slices.  A re-read of Ted’s quote above would be useful at this point. And as I type this paragraph, the London open is just under ten minutes away.  Gold, platinum and palladium prices are unchanged—and silver is up a nickel.  Gold’s net volume is very light at just under 11,500 contracts—virtually all of it of the HFT variety—and silver’s net volume is around 4,200 contracts, with decent roll-overs out of July already.  And after rallying about 20 basis points in the early going in Hong Kong trading on their Friday morning, the dollar index is back to unchanged.  Without doubt, all eyes will be on the job numbers this morning in New York—and what trading ‘action’ will accompany their release. Of course the job numbers should make no difference to the gold price at all, but a long history shows that JPMorgan et al use that as an excuse on many occasions to drive the precious metal prices into the dirt—and I’ll be amazed if that doesn’t happen this morning. Today we get the Commitment of Traders Report for positions held at the close of COMEX trading on Tuesday—and I doubt if we’ll see much, if any, improvement in the Commercial net short positions in either gold or silver, as the reporting week was pretty flat from a price perspective.  All the price action that mattered most didn’t start until the day after the cut-off—and it’s a very safe bet that it was no accident that it happened this way, as “da boyz” have used this trick for at least a decade when they want to hide their tracks for as long as possible. We also get the companion Bank Participation Report as well.  This is data that’s extracted directly from the COT Report—and shows what the world’s banks have been up to during the month that was and, as I always say at this juncture, they’re usually up to quite a bit.  I’ll have all that data in my Saturday column. And as I send the Friday edition of today’s column out the door at 5:25 a.m. EDT, I see that gold began to develop a slight negative bias starting at 2 p.m. Hong Kong time on their Friday afternoon. Ditto for silver.  Gold is down a couple of bucks, but silver is still up a nickel.  Platinum and palladium are trading flat. Gold’s net volume is now a bit over 22,000 contracts—and silver’s net volume is pretty decent as well at 6,500 contracts, but there’s been no increase in roll-over activity from over two hours ago. The dollar index was slowly heading south, but has recovered a bit in the last half hour—and is currently down only 3 basis points. As I said above, all eyes will be on the 8:30 a.m. EDT jobs report—and if you’re feeling a bit like that poor chap in the last cartoon posted above, I’ll certainly understand—as I feel that way myself at the moment. Enjoy your weekend, or what’s left of it if you live west of the International Date Line—and I’ll see you here tomorrow. Here’s the 5-minute gold tick chart courtesy of Brad Robertson.  As you can tell by the volume spikes, “da boyz” stuck it to the Managed Money traders real good once again during the COMEX trading session.  Midnight Wednesday is the vertical gray line—and you have to add two hours for EDT—and the ‘click to enlarge’ feature is a must. The silver chart was similar to gold’s, right up until 3:30 p.m. in the New York Access market.  At that point a willing seller stepped in and ensured that silver closed on its absolute low tick of the day. The high and low ticks were reported by the CME Group as $16.50 and $16.065 in the July contract. Silver finished the Thursday session at $16.075 spot, down 40 cents on the day.  Gross volume was very decent, as was net volume—46,000 contracts. Avrupa and Antofagasta intersect copper-rich VMS in Pyrite Belt, Portugal •             First Greenfields discovery of massive sulfide mineralization in 20 years in the Iberian Pyrite Belt •             10.85 meters of massive and semi-massive/stockwork sulfide mineralization grading 1.81% Cu, 2.57% Pb, 4.38% Zn, 0.13% Sn, and 75.27 ppm Ag •             Including 7.95 meters @ 2.21% Cu, 3.05% Pb, 4.82% Zn, 0.15% Sn, 89.8 ppm Ag •             Followed by 2.90 meters @ 0.71% Cu, 1.27% Pb, 3.17% Zn, 0.092% Sn, 35.4 ppm Ag •             Avrupa and Antofagasta sign an amended Joint Venture Agreement Please visit our website to learn more about the company and current exploration program. Platinum prices were a mini version of the gold price chart—and palladium was a mini version of the platinum chart.  Platinum closed on Thursday at $1,098 spot, down three bucks, finally cracking the $1,100 spot price to the downside.  Palladium also closed 3 dollars lower at $753 spot.  Here are the charts. The CME Daily Delivery Report for Day 5 of the June delivery month showed that zero gold and 9 silver contracts were posted for delivery within the COMEX-approved depositories on Monday.  Nothing to see here. The CME Preliminary Report for the Thursday trading session showed that gold open interest for June dropped another 282 contracts, leaving 1,262 still open.  June o.i. in silver was up 7 contracts to 40. There was no reported change in GLD, but another deposit was made in SLV.  This time it was 1,433,379 troy ounces.  So far this week, there has been a bit over 2.5 million ounces deposited in SLV.  Since the price action indicates that silver should be flowing out of that ETF, the deposits must have been used to cover an existing short position.  We’ll have to wait until about June 23 when the next short position report comes out of the folks over at shortsqueeze.com in order to get a hint of what might be going on. Since yesterday was Thursday, Joshua Gibbons, the Guru of the SLV Bar List, updated his website with the goings-on over at the iShares.com Internet site at the close of trading on Wednesday—and this is what he had to report. “Analysis of the 03 June 2015 bar list, and comparison to the previous week’s list:  1,138,121.2 troy were added (all to Brinks London), 893,539.6 oz were removed (all from Brinks London), and 113 bars had serial number changes.” “The bars removed were from: Solar Applied Materials (0.3M oz, Krasnoyarsk (0.2M oz), and 10 others.  The bars added were from: Krasnoyarsk (0.2M oz), Prioksky (0.1M oz), and 13 others. “As of the time that the bar list was produced, it was overallocated 384.9 oz.  All daily changes are reflected on the bar list.” Over at Switzerland’s Zürcher Kantonalbank for the week ending May 29—they reported tiny declines in both their gold and silver ETFs.  Their gold ETF shed 1,804 troy ounces—and their silver ETF dropped only 7,123 troy ounces. After four straight day of sales, it should come as no surprise that there was no report from the U.S. Mint yesterday. Over at the COMEX-approved depositories on Wednesday, there was 50,092 troy ounces of gold transferred from Canada’s Scotiabank to HSBC USA.  Other than that, there was no activity worth mentioning, but the link to what there was, is here. It was another huge in/out day in silver, as 411,788 troy ounces were received—all at JPMorgan’s vault—and 1,012,058 troy ounces were shipped out.  All of the ‘out’ movement was from Canada’s Scotiabank, including the 411,788 troy ounces that JPMorgan received.  The link to that action is here—and it’s worth a quick look. There wasn’t a lot of activity at the COMEX-approved gold kilobar depositories in Hong Kong on their Wednesday, as only 775 kilobars were reported received—and another 475 were shipped out.  All of the action was at Brink’s, Inc. as usual.  The link to that activity is here. I have a fair number of stories for you today—and I’ll happily leave the final edit up to you. Since we penetrated for the first time to the downside the key 50-day moving average in silver on Wednesday, I suppose the official price take-down cycle is now in effect. Gold, you’ll remember, had penetrated its 50-day moving average a week or so ago, so the market structure there is more advanced than it is in silver. Therefore, in silver, it’s more a question of how many contracts the commercials can induce the managed money traders to sell than it is how low prices must fall. It’s more about contracts sold than prices, although successive lower prices (salami slicing) are necessary to effect the full contract count outcome. In other words, it’s not necessary that we drop dramatically in price, just enough—and in the manner necessary to accomplish whatever complete managed money selling results this go around. Of course, please dismiss any suggestion that I (or anyone else) know for sure the direction of prices in the short term. This is about probabilities based upon the same thing that those probabilities have always been based on – past and prospective COT patterns. And even though those probabilities suggest lower silver prices ahead, any such decline should prove minor compared to the eventual much higher prices that the actual fundamentals and facts point to. While I hope my COT analysis is beneficial, please understand it is not my intent to handicap silver prices in the short term, although many others do seem so engaged. Instead, my intent is to use my analysis of the COT market structure to show just how screwed up is the price discovery process on the COMEX and, after 30 years, it is encouraging to see that at least one silver miner may feel the same. In the unfortunate circumstance that the probabilities once again prove correct and we do witness further declines in the price of silver, perhaps that might aid in convincing other silver producers to step up to the plate and write to the CFTC. Trying to come up with rational explanations for why silver and gold prices behave as they do, while leaving out the COT market structure on the COMEX, is guaranteed to reduce one to the babbling idiot level. —  Silver analyst Ted Butler: 05 June 2015 Another day—and more salami slicing in the all four precious metals, particularly gold and silver.  There was decent volume associated with both metals, so it’s an absolute certainty that the Managed Money was puking longs and piling on the short side, while JPMorgan et al gobbled up everything on the opposite side of those trades for fun, profit and price management purposes.  And it was a very profitable day for “da boyz” yesterday. Here are the 6-month charts for all four precious metals—and new lows were engineered in three of the four precious metals. The gold stocks opened down—and chopped more or less sideways for the remainder of the day, as the HUI closed down another 1.35 percent. It was more or less the same thing in the silver equities, although the trading day had more shape to it.  The big drop because someone sold a boat load of shares in Peñoles right at the close, at least that’s what Nick said yesterday when I asked him.  Because of that, Nick’s Silver Sentiment Index got hit for 2.26 percent.  Without that share dump, the loss would have been about 0.5 percent. Without doubt, all eyes will be on the job numbers this morning The gold price chopped around, mostly lower, during the Far East trading session on their Thursday—and both the rally attempt in the Far East—and the one in early London trading, met with a resolute seller the moment that the price attempted to break above unchanged.  JPMorgan et al, HFT algorithms in hand, did the dirty starting the moment that COMEX trading began—and by around 11:20 a.m. EDT, their work was done for the day, with another low for this move down.  The gold price rallied quietly after that, before chopping sideways starting around 2:40 p.m. in electronic trading. The high and low tick were recorded as $1,186.60 and $1,172.40 in the August contract. The gold price closed in New York yesterday at $1,176.40 spot, down another $8.60 from Wednesday’s close.  Net volume was very decent at 148,000 contracts. Here’s the 6-month U.S. Dollar chart as a reference. The dollar index finished the Wednesday trading session in New York at 95.37—and traded virtually ruler flat until about 1:30 p.m. Hong Kong time.  At that juncture it rallied 20 basis points, hitting 95.56 at 8:30 a.m. BST in London trading.  It fell of a cliff at 9 a.m. right on the button, hitting its 94.72 low about thirty five minutes later.  Then at noon BST it appeared that ‘gentle hands’ showed up—and the dollar rallied to a handful of basis points above unchanged minutes before trading began in the equity markets in New York.  It rallied higher from there in a rather choppy manner—and closed yesterday at 95.58—up 21 basis points from Wednesday. It’s obvious to me that the dollar would crash if given the opportunity to do so—and it’s equally as obvious that the powers-that-be are at hand to prevent that from happening.last_img read more

Healthy women with normal pregnancies can opt to h

first_imgHealthy women with normal pregnancies can opt to have labor induced without worrying that the decision will make a cesarean section more likely, according to a major study published in this week’s New England Journal of Medicine.Obstetricians currently induce labor when a delivery has failed to progress, or if a woman is far overdue for giving birth. But when women who have no medical need for induced labor have talked to their doctors, “We’ve been saying, ‘Well you know one thing you need to know is it does increase the C-section rate,’ ” says. Dr. Uma Reddy, an obstetrics researcher at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.That advice was based on some older medical research. But researchers had doubts about that conclusion. So Reddy helped organize a study involving more than 6,000 first-time mothers with uncomplicated pregnancies, to put the idea to the test.Half the pregnant women followed the normal course of labor; the other half had labor induced when the baby was full term, at 39 weeks. Overall, mothers and babies did fine when labor was induced with a drug.”I think the most surprising finding was a decrease in the C-section rate,” Reddy says.That rate dropped from 22 percent among the women who weren’t automatically induced to 19 percent for those whose labor was induced. Dr. William Grobman, the study’s first author and a professor of obstetrics at Northwestern University, says it’s an important goal to reduce the rate of cesarean sections in the U.S. So even a small percentage drop in the rate can have benefits overall.But an individual woman might or might not consider that 3-percentage-point drop a big deal. “I think that’s not really for me to decide,” he says. “I think that’s for patients to decide.”As expected, women who opted to have their labor induced spent more time in the labor and delivery suite.Even so, Grobman says, “I also think it’s important to recognize women who planned to be induced had fewer days in the hospital and their children had fewer days in the hospital after delivery.”The study found that women whose labor was induced were less likely to develop pre-eclampsia, an abrupt and life-threatening increase in blood pressure. Their babies were less likely to need help breathing. So all in all, it seemed medical intervention was a net plus.That was certainly the story for 33-year-old Kelli Rojek, a Chicago woman who opted into the study and whose labor was induced. She thought about the risk of having a longer labor.”The concern I was most aware of was that it can slow down labor and it can cause some headaches or nausea afterward,” she told NPR.But she also saw benefits.”It was actually rather convenient for us,” she says, “because we have a dog at home and we were able to call our families and say, ‘Hey, we’re going to go in at 11 p.m. on this day, and can you guys come up to take care of the dog and then come up to the hospital afterward?’ “Quick labor runs in her family, Rojek says. By 6:30 the next morning, her son, Harrison, came into the world.”The doctor actually told me that I should never share my story with my friends,” she says, “because they wouldn’t want to hear how fast and easy things went!”Lisa Kane Low, immediate past president of the American College of Nurse-Midwives, says the study was done well and provides useful information but that she is concerned that doctors and their patients will be nudged toward this more medical approach to childbirth.”Some of the things that go along with an induction may not be part of what they had planned for their overall birth experience,” Kane Low tells Shots. “It does require an IV, it does require that you have continuous electronic fetal monitoring to be safe, and it requires the use of different medications in order to start the labor process. And all those things need to be factored into what someone was hoping for their overall birth experience.”And the potential benefits can be hard to convey, Kane Low says.”If you say to somebody, ‘We could really reduce your risk of a cesarean by inducing your labor,’ people who are very fearful of a cesarean may say, ‘OK, I’m willing to [make that] trade-off and take the medical induction, even though that’s not what I might want because it’s going to reduce my risk.’ But, yet, the absolute reduction is very small, overall.”Plus, this study was done under optimal conditions, she notes. The hospitals all followed the latest recommendations about when to do a C-section, and the women were 23 or 24 years old, on average — which is younger than the general age of women who give birth.The March of Dimes, which has a campaign to encourage women to have full-term deliveries, issued a statement noting that because the study group was so selective, “[m]ore widespread implementation of induction at 39 weeks may yield much less favorable results, and thus should be considered with caution.”The study did not compare the overall costs of induced labor versus the traditional path — which can end in vaginal delivery, cesarean section or induced labor.Reddy agrees that there are balancing pluses and minuses behind the decision to induce labor. “I think it’s going to be up to the individual woman, because there are going to be strong opinions either way.”You can reach Richard Harris at rharris@npr.org. Copyright 2018 NPR. To see more, visit http://www.npr.org/.last_img read more

I am the only remaining person interested in the Parliamentary seat –

first_imgThe newly elected Nationalist Councillor for Xaghra Gozo Kevin Cutajar, has said on Facebook that in light of Jean Pierre Debono’s decision to withdraw his interest in David Stellini’s parliamentary seat, he is the only remaining person interested.Cutajar said that he wrote a letter to the Secretary General of the Nationalist Party informing them of his interest. He said that he now awaits an answer.Updated: Debono’s stepping back seen as common sense by CutajarHis comments come after the controversy surrounding the co-option of Mr Stellini’s seat in the Parliament.  There were many who argued that  it would be wise to give Cutajar the seat seeing as it helped maintain the representation of Gozo in the Parliament. Others believed that it should be given to Debono given that he gave up his Parliamentary seat for the Opposition Leader Adrian Delia.Read more:PN requests Speaker to postpone motion to co-opt DebonoDangerously ambitious – ArrigoUpdated: Gozitan seat fraudulently stolen – former PN Executive President SammutLast Saturday, the PN’s Executive Committee voted 42 to 40 in favour of Jean Pierre Debono taking Stellini’s former seat. This didn’t last as the PN’s Regional Committee for Gozo challenged the Executive Committee’s decision as null and void. This led to Debono withdrawing his interest.WhatsApp <a href=’http://revive.newsbook.com.mt/www/delivery/ck.php?n=ab2c8853&amp;cb={random}’ target=’_blank’><img src=’https://revive.newsbook.com.mt/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=97&amp;cb={random}&amp;n=ab2c8853&amp;ct0={clickurl_enc}’ border=’0′ alt=” /></a> SharePrintlast_img read more

Elon Musk Says True SelfDriving Teslas Could Be Ready in 2020

first_img 2019 Entrepreneur 360 List –shares Entrepreneur Staff Add to Queue The only list that measures privately-held company performance across multiple dimensions—not just revenue. Next Article Tesla But he’s been wrong before. Entrepreneur Staff Despite the name, Tesla’s Autopilot feature will not safely drive you home from work or anywhere else. Of course, that hasn’t stopped brazen Tesla owners from abusing the system (one was even allegedly drunk and asleep behind the wheel).But according to Tesla co-founder and CEO Elon Musk, true self-driving Tesla vehicles will be available next year.Related: The Daily Schedules of Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Oprah Winfrey and Other Famous Business Billionaires“I think we will be ‘feature complete’ on full self-driving this year, meaning the car will be able to find you in a parking lot, pick you up, take you all the way to your destination without an intervention this year,” Musk said during a podcast interview, as reported by Wired. “I am certain of that. That is not a question mark.”Of course, Musk has been off with his predictions in the past — just look at the whole production debacle he landed his company in after promising Tesla would manufacture 20,000 Model 3 cars a month by December of 2017. Yet still, Musk was at it again yesterday.Meant to say annualized production rate at end of 2019 probably around 500k, ie 10k cars/week. Deliveries for year still estimated to be about 400k.— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 20, 2019 Apply Now » 2 min read Image credit: Bloomberg | Getty Images February 20, 2019 Elon Musk Says True Self-Driving Teslas Could Be Ready in 2020last_img read more

How to Clean Up an Online Reputation

first_img Sarah Jacobsson Purewal How to Clean Up an Online Reputation Add to Queue Free Webinar | July 31: Secrets to Running a Successful Family Business If you own a small or medium business, a good reputation — online and offline — is clearly key to your success. The stakes are also high for individuals, who can win or lose jobs based upon how they appear in Web search results.The Internet can overwhelm users with information, so anything negative — especially if it appears high in search results — can have a drastically harmful effect on your success and how people see you.Among U.S. recruiters, 70 percent have rejected candidates based on their online reputation — and yet only 7 percent of Americans believe that their online reputation can affect their job search, according to a 2010 study by Microsoft and Cross-Tab Market Research. A potential customer who searches for your business online is a lot like a recruiter, trying to find the best company for the job.Ignoring how you or your company appears in search results and on ratings Websites has arguably never been more perilous.One significant figure in the recently altered relationship between businesses and search engines is Vitaly Borker, owner of retail eyewear Website DecorMyEyes.com, who told the New York Times in November that his unconventional search engine optimization (SEO) strategy worked like a charm: Borker harassed customers, directing them to vent on the Internet. His Website thus climbed higher in Google’s search results, bolstered by the many links from established review Websites.Google immediately reworked its code and buried DecorMyEyes along with other businesses it deemed “bad.” Now that Google no longer rewards bad customer service with top spots in searches, it’s a good time to examine how your business can get more positive attention in legitimate ways.Should You Pay for Online Reputation Management?Deciding to take control of your online reputation is a daunting task, and you may be tempted just to hire someone to do it for you. Online reputation management companies abound on the Internet — claiming everything from 100 percent success rate (or your money back) to a “special technology” that reorders search results.Such companies may be worth looking into, but there is no magical way to erase content from the Internet. Once something is uploaded to the Web, it’s impossible for you or a third party to remove it without help from the administrator of the Website where it appears.It’s even harder to remove content from search engines (like Google) that cache their results and enable surfers, with the click of the Cached link, to view content that has been “removed.” In addition, the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine stores records of Websites dating back to the 1990s.Organizations such as ReputationDefender, RemoveYourName, and Integrity Defenders offer business packages to help you take on your online reputation. Essentially, however, these services focus on two tasks: requesting that negative information about you or your company be taken down, and helping you create new content to displace the negative content.ReputationDefender, which is perhaps the best-known reputation-oriented service, charges between $3000 and $10,000 to monitor your reputation. RemoveYourName and Integrity Defenders are a bit cheaper; their packages start at $3000 and $630, respectively. Often the quoted prices are just a starting point. ReputationDefender charges extra, for example, for helping you get rid of unsavory remarks that they uncover.Here are some key points to remember if you decide to hire an online reputation management company:Weigh any negative reviews of the company more heavily than you normally would. Remember, these companies are in the business of defending and rehabilitating reputations; if 10 “bad” reviews of their own service get through, imagine how many others they may have buried.No company has the magical power to automatically remove negative reviews from the Internet.Consider the benefits of a service that charges monthly versus a flat-fee service. Monthly services, such as BrandsEye, will constantly monitor your reputation. Flat-fee services, such as RemoveYourName, will spend as much time as it takes to get results. If you’re looking to remove specific negative reviews, a flat-fee service might be best for you; but if you just want someone to monitor your reputation, a monthly service makes more sense.It’s entirely possible that a reputation-monitoring service won’t be able to help you, or that the service’s efforts may backfire. In the case of Ronnie Segev, ReputationDefender and a blog called The Consumerist ended up in a spitting match after ReputationDefender requested that an article about Segev be removed.If you don’t have room in your budget for professional reputation management — or if you’ve decided that the service doesn’t justify the price — you can take on tracking and managing your online reputation by yourself.Step 1: Track Your Online PresencePerform a search for your company name in a general search engine, such as Google or Bing. Be sure to search not only for your company’s name, but also for related keywords, possible misspellings, and phrases (utilizing quotation marks). Note any negative reviews and where your company’s Website appears in relation to them (higher or lower). Cross-check your search on other search engines. For tips on effective ways to perform more-detailed searches, see “28 Time-Saving Tricks for Google, Facebook, and More.”Run site-specific searches on relevant Websites, including social media Websites such as Facebook and Twitter, review Websites like Yelp and Kudzu, and consumer advocacy sites such as GetSatisfaction and Ripoff Report. To perform a site-specific search of reviews of cupcake makers on Yelp, for example, type the following into Google: cupcake site:yelp.comSearch for individuals if you want to track the information available about you or your colleagues on people search engines such as Spokeo. Though most of these sites simply grab information that’s publicly available from other sources, you can try contacting them directly to request that they not present all the data to the public.Sign up for alerts from search engines. Google Alerts allows you to track search terms by type. The service will send any new mentions of your search term to your inbox daily, weekly, or in real time.Consider using BrandsEye or a similar service. This is one part of the process where paying for a service can definitely be useful. BrandsEye, which costs about $100 per month, not only tracks your online presence, but analyzes it, too. BrandsEye weighs each mention of your company as coming from an important or unimportant source and gauges how much effect each mention has on your overall reputation (similar to the way the Google search algorithm supposedly works).Step 2: Address the IssuesRead the reviews, both negative and positive. People usually spend more time reviewing services they feel strongly about, whether that feeling is love or hate. You can thus use negative online reviews constructively, especially if reviewers bring up legitimate complaints.Contact Websites if you encounter any false or unnecessarily vindictive reviews, and request that they be removed.Respond to customer complaints by apologizing and offering your side of the story. Then if someone later sees the negative comment about your company, they’ll also see that you’re committed to fixing and fostering good relationships with your customers. No matter how tempting it is, never trade insults with the customer — it’s harder for potential customers to identify with you than with a fellow consumer.Step 3: Connect and Create ContentConnect with your customers via social networking Websites. It’s not enough to have a Facebook page or a Twitter account that you post dry, business-related updates to — you have to engage your customers and help them get to know you, your business, and your brand. Content should be interesting — now is not the time to pitch your business or products — and try to encourage feedback from your followers.Create original content for the search engines, to displace any negative content that is currently popping up. This may take the form of anything from blog posts to informative articles to contests.Never “astroturf” by posting fake reviews, no matter how Web-savvy you are. If you’re found out, you’ll lose the respect of your customers, and you could also face legal trouble.Online reputation management might seem like a full-time job, but that’s not necessarily the case. If you take the steps to gauge the general tone of your brand’s online presence and discover that you’re doing a pretty good job, retaining a professional reputation defense company to obliterate one or two bad reviews makes little sense.If, on the other hand, your brand has a less-than-stellar reputation on the Internet, be aware that there is no one-step route to a rehabilitated rep; slow and steady relationship building is the most effective way to gain the reputation you desire. In most instances, a small business’s marketing teams should be able to handle online reputation management, since much of the task involves basic social networking and Website upkeep, along with reaching out to the clientele.Unfortunately, bad things have a way of snowballing — or “going viral” — on the Internet, so it’s possible that a bad hit to your reputation can become a big deal if you handle it poorly or fail to handle it at all. In these situations, having someone — whether it be a professional company or a full-time staff member — dedicated to protecting your reputation can be very helpful. If your online reputation is getting too hot to handle, for whatever reason, bringing in professional help should remove some of the stress. But no matter how professional a company or individual dedicated to online reputation management may be, ultimately they can’t do anything that you couldn’t do yourself with enough time and persistence.  9 min read January 14, 2011 Marketingcenter_img Controlling how you appear in search results and on social networking sites doesn’t have to be hard. Brought to you by PCWorld Learn how to successfully navigate family business dynamics and build businesses that excel. Next Article –shares Register Now »last_img read more

11 Insaaaane Things You Didnt Know About the Founder of Crazy Eddie

first_img Learn how to successfully navigate family business dynamics and build businesses that excel. Eddie Antar died this weekend at age 68. Register Now » Jason Fell News and Trends Free Webinar | July 31: Secrets to Running a Successful Family Business Director of the Entrepreneur Partner Studio Eddie Antar (R) once known as Crazy Eddie Next Article September 12, 2016 Eddie Antar was an entrepreneur who realized the highs of business success as well as the lows of fraud and running from authorities. You might not recognize his name, but if you were alive in the late 1970s and 1980s, you’d be hard pressed not to know his business: he was the founder of the Crazy Eddie discount electronics store chain.From his quirky TV and radio commercials, how could you forget that his prices were totally “inasaaaaaane!”Antar died on Saturday. He was 68.Born in 1947, Antar opened his first Crazy Eddie electronics store when he was in his early 20s, in Brooklyn, N.Y. With the help of his popular commercials – which aired for nearly 15 years and starred radio personality Jerry Carroll – the business grew into a small empire of stores up and down the East Coast. VCRs, video games and camcorders (remember those?) were hot sellers at the time.But Antar’s “success” wouldn’t last forever. Here’s a quick look at 11 moments during his rise and fascinatingly bizarre fall:Antar opened his first Crazy Eddie electronics store in 1969 on Kings Highway in Brooklyn.The term “crazy” came from Antar’s wild sales style. Apparently, he’d accept customers’ shoes as deposits on items like TVs or stereos.His first commercial aired in 1975. Each one ended with the phrase, “’Crazy Eddie, his prices are insaaaaaane!” He continued to open new locations in the New York metro area.Riding the brand’s popularity (those ads were memorable), Antar took the company public in 1984.At its height, the company had more than 40 locations from Boston to Philadelphia, and was generating as much as $350 million in revenue a year.By 1987, stockholders discovered that $45 million in merchandise was missing. His business and accounting practices were called into question and the stockholders staged a takeover of the company. After all, how could he have such insanely low prices?Federal prosecutors eventually charged Antar and his family of skimming cash and manipulating the company’s stock.In 1989, Crazy Eddie filed for bankruptcy and its final store closed.The following year, Antar fled the country and was later found living in Israel. He was extradited and served seven years in U.S. prison.Antar’s cousin, Sam, who was the company’s CFO, pleaded guilty to fraud and later served as a consultant to governmental agencies that were investigating accounting fraud.In 2001, a newly freed Antar attempted to bring Crazy Eddie’s back, selling electronics online. Despite the cheesy ads, there wasn’t enough steam in the brand for a second go and the company failed. Add to Queue –shares 11 Insaaaane Things You Didn’t Know About the Founder of Crazy Eddie 3 min read Entrepreneur Staff Image credit: Sven Nackstrand/AFP | Getty Imageslast_img read more

Staff fraud may cost Chinas DJI drone maker 150 million

first_img Citation: Staff fraud may cost China’s DJI drone maker $150 million (2019, January 21) retrieved 17 July 2019 from https://phys.org/news/2019-01-staff-fraud-china-dji-drone.html A company spokeswoman said DJI has established a special anti-corruption group to conduct in-depth investigations Explore further Chinese drone maker DJI has placed 45 employees under investigation for alleged fraud that could cost the company more than one billion yuan ($150 million) in losses, the firm said Monday. Embattled GlaxoSmithKline hit with another fraud probecenter_img © 2019 AFP The world’s top civilian drone maker said in an internal memo that most of the employees involved in the fraud worked in the supply chain, and 29 were fired while 16 were reported to the police.The case is expected to involve more than 100 people and many people will be facing a sentence in jail, according to Friday’s memo, whose authenticity was confirmed by a company spokeswoman on Monday.The initial investigation is just “the tip of the iceberg,” the spokeswoman told AFP.The memo said the employees fraudulently inflated the prices of parts for personal financial gains.The staffers received kickbacks from suppliers that charged double or triple the price to sell parts to DJI, the memo said.A company spokeswoman said DJI has established a special anti-corruption group to conduct in-depth investigations.”DJI will not tolerate corruption because of the rapid development and will not stop its development because of corruption,” she told AFP.The company has become the latest in a string of Chinese tech firms dealing with internal misdeeds in recent months.China’s dominant ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing uncovered more than 60 cases of corruption within the company last year.Yang Weidong, former president of Alibaba’s video-streaming platform Youku, stepped down and was put under investigation in December on suspicion of accepting improper payments, according to Chinese media. This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.last_img read more

Telangana Govt to go ahead with setting up of Bayyaram steel plant

first_imgPanel formed to submit a detailed report in one month Published on Telangana Despite the Central Government remaining silent on the proposal to set up an integrated steel plant in Bayyaram, the Telangana Government has resolved to take up the issue more vigorously.The State Government has repeatedly approached the Centre for the past four years for setting up the plant. Despite giving an assurance of bearing 50 per cent of the expenditure, there is no positive response, said the Minister for IT & Industries, K T Rama Rao. The Government has constituted a committee to study and submit a detailed report on Bayyaram steel plant in one month. It includes officials from Energy, Singareni, Mines and Geology & TSMDC Departments. The committee will study the process of establishment of a steel plant and availability of land, water and iron ore resources and road connectivity. As per AP State Reorganisation Act 2014, Telangana has been assured a steel plant at Bayyaram. “Though there are a lot of possibilities for setting up of a steel plant at Bayyaram, the Central Government is not responding positively since four years,” Rama Rao stated as per an official release. The Telangana Government has been pursuing the issue of setting up of the steel plant with the Union Government. The Minister reiterated that the State Government would continue its efforts to get the steel plant established at Bayyaram at any cost. “The Telangana Government is committed to Bayyaram steel plant with or without the support of Government of India,” the Minister contended. The steel plant at Bayyaram is expected to create a lot of direct and in indirect employment opportunities in the State. COMMENTS Telangana Minister for IT & Industries, K T Rama Rao.   –  The Hindu SHARE SHARE EMAIL SHARE June 18, 2018 iron and steel COMMENTlast_img read more

Topworth Steels promoters arrested released on bail

first_imgThe police have arrested the Mumbai-based promoters of Topworth Steels and Power — Abhay and Surendra Lodha — for dishonouring a cheque worth ₹10 crore issued to its creditors.Abhay and Surendra were later released on bail after submitting an affidavit to honour the commitment.Earlier, the Mumbai Metropolitan Magistrate Court had also issued arrest warrants against the Topworth Group of Companies and its directors for dishonouring a number of cheques, totalling ₹47 crore.If convicted, a lawyer said the directors face up to two years imprisonment, and will be liable to pay compensation of twice the dishonoured cheque amount to creditors. The Topworth Group and its directors are already being probed by the CBI for using fraudulent letters of credit to dupe banks of ₹137 crore.The complaint with the CBI was filed by the State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda and UCO Bank. Following this, the CBI in July conducted searches across 17 locations including Mumbai, Raigarh and Amravati were the company had offices.Lenders led by the three banks have also filed cases in the Mumbai debt recovery tribunal –– either individually or as a consortium with other private lenders –– against the Topworth Group of Companies and its subsidiaries (Topworth Steels & Power, Topworth Urja & Metals and Topworth Pipes & Tubes) for a cumulative default of about ₹3,200 crore.Besides the group’s assets, banks have also attached flats owned by the Lodha family in Pune, Mumbai, and Nagpur and land in Jalgaon, Delhi and Chattisgarh, sources said. Published on December 12, 2018 COMMENTS COMMENTcenter_img A Mumbai court also issued arrest warrants against the Topworth Group of Companies and its directors for dishonouring a number of cheques. SHARE SHARE EMAIL SHARElast_img read more